Friday, February 15, 2008

The Pharisees: Who Were They?

Who were the Pharisees?

In some sense they were a small party of approximately six thousand men, women and slaves that had chosen to restrict themselves to a level of purity that Scripture demanded only of priests, and as a result they would not dine at the home of a non-Pharisee. The purpose of this was not ostracism, because they could have a 'common person' over for dinner, as Simon the Pharisee had Jesus over. They were simply abiding by a decision they had made to not consume food that the ordinary person had, in perfect accordance with Scripture, no problem with.

This creature of the water would have been considered 'clean' because it had fins and scales.

Along this same line, they were rigid about tithing the first (10%) and second (an additional 10%) tithes in a time when people had very little money; to this end, they tithed what they ate, what they bought and what they sold. This was partially to prevent themselves from breaking a Scripture that could be taken in different ways; if you interpreted it strictly enough, there was no chance you were breaking it.

In a second, and larger, sense they were a set of men who were highly educated in Scripture and had taken it upon themselves to instruct the rest of the population, rather successfully it seems. Jesus says,

"The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses' seat, so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach but do not practice." (Matthew 23:2-3)

(The 'Moses seat' was a prominent chair at the front of the synagogue. Italics mine.)

David Flusser quotes an Essene document found in the Dead Sea Scrolls: "The Pharisees were described as 'slippery exegetes', their actions were hypocrisy, and by means of their 'deceitful doctrine, lying tongues and false lips,' they were able to lead almost the whole people astray."* (Italics mine.)

Clearly they had the power to instruct the people, as the first century historian Josephus confirms, and they interpreted Scripture correctly enough that Jesus commanded the people to obey them. Also according to Josephus, they had great respect for their elders, were enthusiastic about making converts, and believed in angels, demons and heaven.**

In a third sense, they were a party powerful enough that even the high priest had to follow their way of doing things on the Day of Atonement, although he believed differently. They were present in the Sanhedrin, the ruling council, although we don't know to what extent. They seem to have played a minimal role in Jesus' trial, but joined the chief priests in requesting Pilate to secure the tomb (Matthew 27:62) after Jesus' death. Later, in the First Jewish Revolt of 66-70 AD, they played a leading role.***

An Islamic shrine now occupies the site of the Temple, where the high priest would have carried out the Day of Atonement ceremony.

So what were they? A political party, a sect, the set of beliefs most people followed? What category can we stuff them in? None, it seems, like we can’t stuff the word ‘Democrat,’ into one hole. Democrats (and Republicans) are national leaders and average Americans. To say “I’m a Democrat,” doesn’t mean I’m registered as one, nor does it mean that I believe everything they believe. It’s just a general dividing line. Those who work for the party, presumably, have a firmer alignment with them.

In the same way, being one of the six thousand registered Pharisees may have made you a Pharisee, and being a member of the public that roughly aligned yourself with Pharisaic beliefs may have made you a Pharisee. Those who were registered as one presumably had a firmer alignment with them. To this end, we have a sect of Pharisees and a general set of beliefs most people, as Pharisees, followed.

As for the Pharisees as a political party themselves – it wasn’t like that back then. Today we are Presbyterian and Democrats (or whatever). Back then things were just more mixed, and we can’t project today’s societal structure onto the first century.

Sources
Bivin, David, 2005, New Light on the Difficult Words of Jesus: Insights from His Jewish Context, En-Gedi Resource Center

Flusser, David, and Notley, Steven, 2007, The Sage of Galilee: Rediscovering Jesus' Genius, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

Neale, David, 1991, None But the Sinners, Sheffield Academic Press

Scott Jr., J. Julius, 1995, Jewish Backgrounds of the New Testament, Baker Book House

Saldarini, Anthony J., 2001, Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

Scripture
Fish - Leviticus 11:12: Anything living in the water that does not have fins and scales is to be detestable to you.

Footnotes
*Flusser, 46
**Scott, 205-206
***Scott, 204

3 comments:

Anders Branderud said...

Hello! I found your website. My name is Anders Branderud, I am 23 years and I am from Sweden.

By practising Torah non-selectively, just like the historical Jesus did, we make the world a better place to live in!

To realize that one can follow two polar-opposite masters — the authentic, historical, PRO-Torah 1st-century Ribi from Nazareth – the Messiah - and the 4th-century (post-135 C.E.), arch-antithesis ANTI-Torah apostasy developed by the Hellenists (namely the Sadducees and Roman pagans who conspired to kill Ribi YÓ™hoshua, displaced his original followers (the Netzarim) and redacted the NT); is a step in that direction!

So who then was the historical Jesus? His name was Ribi Yehoshua.
The research of world-recognized authorities (for example Barrie Wilson; www.barriewilson.com) in this area implies that Ribi Yehoshua was a Pharisee (a Torah-practising Jewish group - who according to 4Q MMT (a Scroll found in the Qumran-caves) practised both written and oral Torah (oral Torah in an unbroken chain since Mosheh (Moses); commanded by Mosheh in Torah; oral Torah is recorded Beit-Din (Jewish Court)-decisions of how Torah shall be applied).. As the earliest church historians, most eminent modern university historians, our web site (www.netzarim.co.il) and our Khavruta (Distance Learning) texts confirm, the original teachings of Ribi Yehoshua were not only accepted by most of the Pharisaic Jewish community, he had hoards of Jewish students.

For words that you don’t understand; se www.netzarim.co.il ; the link to Glossaries at the first page.

Ribi Yehoshua warned for false prophets who don’t produce good fruit = defined as don’t practise the commandments in Torah according to Halakhah (oral Torah; see the above definition). See Devarim (Deuteronomy) 13:1-6.

The research of Scholars in leading universities which implies that Ribi Yehoshua was a Pharisee necessarily implies that if you want to follow him you need to practise his Torah-teachings.
So you need to start follow the historical Ribi Yehoshua – the Messiah – by practising Torah (including oral Torah)!

Finding the historical Jew, who was a Pharisee Ribi and following him brings you into Torah, which gives you a rich and meaningful life here on earth and great rewards in life after death (“heaven”)!

From Anders Branderud
Geir Toshav, Netzarim in Ra’anana in Israel (www.netzarim.co.il) who is followers of Ribi Yehoshua – the Messiah – in Orthodox Judaism

Emily Jamison said...

Hi,
Thanks very much for your interesting comments. Unfortunately I won't be able to respond right away, as I only work on this blog on Saturdays, but I will get to it as soon as I can.

Kind Regards,

Emily Jamison

Emily Jamison said...

Hi Anders,
Thanks for your input. A word first to other readers: Torah is the first five books of the Christian Old Testament - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. It contains, among other things, the creation account, the patriarchal ccounts, the journey Moses led from Egypt to the Promised Land, and the Law God gave to Moses. In Jesus' time this was studied more than the other sections of the Old Testament.

There were four primary political parties in Jesus' time: 1) Sadduccees, a small group of aristocrats who believed in a more literal translation of the Law; 2)Essenes, ascetics who believed in sharing all income and goods; 3)Zealots, extremists that in succeeding decades killed in the name of God and may well have in Jesus' time as well; and 4) Pharisees, who were the primary religious teachers. Most people seem to have fit into this latter group - see my quote above saying the Pharisees "were able to lead almost the whole people astray."

Jesus, also as I stated above, seems to have believed in the teachings of the Pharisees; he strongly condemned their hypocrisy. Matthew 23:2-3, as quoted above: “The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses' seat, so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach but do not practice."

Furthermore, Jesus followed almost all of written and oral Torah, although he did condone the disciples' eating from the grainfields.

Given his support of their teachings, following of their teachings and seeming lack of identification with any other group, I see no reason to believe that he wasn't a Pharisee. He simply wasn't a hypocrite about it.

I also don't see any reason to think he wouldn't have had 'hoards of Jewish students.' Certainly many people followed him and he sent out 72 disciples for a short period of time.

There are many legal rules in Torah that I don't believe Christians need to follow. I do agree that we should follow the spirit of Torah, as Jesus did. The Old Testament was the Bible he used, and God wasn't in much of a hurry to add on the New Testament; it took a few hundred years to develop the canon. Torah is part of the Christian Scriptures and I doubt most Christians would dispute the idea that following it, when not overruled by the New Testament, is the right thing to do. I believe that Jesus can also be 'found' by studying the Gospels and other parts of the Old and New Testaments. God is a triune God, and by studying the Old Testament we receive fresh revelations about His love, power and will, among other things.

You might be interested in a book written by Florence and Marita Littauer, leaders of a primary Christian public speaking organization called CLASS, titled "Journey to Jesus: Looking for God in All the Right Places." I haven't read it, but apparently it is on finding Jesus in Genesis and Exodus.

In a nutshell, I essentially agree with you that Jesus was a Pharisee, that Torah is important and that Jesus can be found by studying Torah. As I said, I also believe he can be found in other ways.

Thanks for posting your thoughts.

Kind Regards,

Emily Jamison